Exponential Equations and Inequalities
When the unknown is in the index, as in or , no amount of ordinary algebra will bring it down. Taking logarithms will: the power law turns the index into a coefficient, and the equation becomes linear. The syllabus asks you to use logarithms to solve equations and inequalities in which the unknown appears in indices, quoting examples such as , and . These appear on almost every P3 paper, sometimes alone for three or four marks, sometimes hidden inside a quadratic, a modulus or a growth model.
Why taking logs works
The power law of logarithms says , for any base of logarithm. Applied to :
Two facts make this legitimate:
- Both sides are positive (any with is positive), so their logarithms exist.
- is one-one: if then , and conversely. Taking logs of an equation neither gains nor loses solutions.
Any base works. (base ) and give the same final answer, because . Use by default, since it is what the rest of P3 uses.
For , and :
If , the equation has no solution.
. The first is about ; the second is about . A quotient of logs does not simplify with the quotient law.
Equations with the unknown in both indices
For , take logs and bring both powers down. The result is a linear equation in , with the logs acting as numerical coefficients.
- If both sides can be written as powers of the same number (for example and ), do that and equate the indices. No logs needed.
- Otherwise take of both sides: .
- Expand the brackets. Treat and as numbers.
- Collect the terms on one side, factorise out , and divide.
- Give the exact form if asked (you can tidy it with the log laws), then a decimal to the accuracy required, usually 3 significant figures.
For example, is , so and .
Hidden quadratics
If an equation contains both and , it is a quadratic in disguise, because . Substitute . Watch for the index laws that produce these terms:
Solve for , then solve for each positive root. A negative or zero value of gives no solution, because . This is the same technique as equations that are quadratic in a function of x from P1.
Faced with , taking logs term by term is wrong: there is no law for . Logs can only be taken of a whole side that is a single product, quotient or power. If there are several exponential terms added together, look for a quadratic or a common factor.
Inequalities
The syllabus examples and are inequalities. The method is the same as for equations, with one point of care.
Taking of both sides is safe, because is an increasing function: if then . The direction of the inequality is kept.
The danger is the next step, when you divide by . If , then and the sign is kept. If , then , and dividing by a negative number reverses the inequality.
The second result makes sense: decreases as increases, so it falls below only for large enough (here ).
- Isolate the power: divide or subtract so that stands alone. Dividing by a positive constant keeps the sign.
- Take of both sides. The sign is kept.
- Bring the power down: .
- Divide by . If , reverse the inequality. It is wise to write "" next to that line.
- Finish the linear inequality, and check with one test value.
The smallest integer that works
A common context: "Find the smallest integer such that ." Solve as an inequality, , then choose the next integer: . Do not round to ; check that while .
Equations with e
Equations in follow the same rules, but directly, so the step "divide by " disappears: . See Euler's number, e^x and ln x for these and for quadratics in .
Worked examples
Solve , giving your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
Solution
Check: .
Solve the equation , giving your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
Solution
Take natural logs of both sides:
Expand and collect the terms:
So
(The tidy exact form uses and .)
Solve the inequality , giving the boundary value correct to 3 significant figures.
Solution
Isolate the power (dividing by keeps the sign): .
Take logs (the sign is kept, since is increasing):
Divide by , which is positive:
Check with : , which is consistent with .
Solve .
Solution
. Let :
. .
Both values of are positive, so both give solutions: or .
A ball is dropped and each bounce reaches of the height of the previous one. After bounces the height is metres. Find the smallest number of bounces after which the height is less than metres.
Solution
.
Since , dividing reverses the inequality:
So the smallest number of bounces is . (Check: , .)
(a) Solve the inequality , giving the boundary values correct to 3 significant figures.
(b) Solve the equation , giving any non-integer answer in exact form.
Solution
(a) .
All three parts are positive, so take logs throughout, keeping the signs, and divide by :
(b) The right-hand side is always positive, so both cases of the modulus are possible: or . Write and let .
Case 1: , so ().
Case 2: .
Check : . Check the first: , . Both are valid.
- Not isolating the power first. From , writing is wrong: is not . Divide by first, or use .
- Losing brackets. , not .
- Forgetting to reverse. Dividing by , or any log of a number between and flips the inequality.
- Writing or . Neither is true.
- Keeping . In a hidden quadratic, a non-positive root for must be rejected with the reason .
- Rounding a boundary the wrong way. For "smallest integer ", always go up from the boundary (for , ) and check both neighbouring integers.
- Show the line with the logs taken, such as . That line usually earns the first method mark on its own.
- Answers are normally required to 3 significant figures. Keep full calculator values until the end; an answer from rounded logs may be outside the accepted range.
- Inequality answers should be given as an inequality (), not as an equation. If the question says "solve the inequality", an answer "" loses the final mark.
- For a modulus with exponentials, solve each case separately and check each solution in the original equation, especially if the other side could be negative.
- If you can write both sides as powers of the same base, examiners accept that method; it is quicker and gives an exact answer.
- Unknown in an index: isolate the power, take logs, bring the index down with .
- (needs ). This is not .
- : , then collect terms and factorise.
- and together: substitute ; reject .
- Inequalities: taking keeps the sign; dividing by reverses it when .
- For the smallest integer, solve the inequality and round up; check the integers either side.
Practice
- Solve , giving your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
- Solve , giving your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
- Solve , giving your answer in the form and correct to 3 significant figures.
- Solve the inequality .
- Solve the inequality .
- Find the smallest integer such that .
- Solve the equation .
- Solve the inequality .
- (a) Solve the equation , giving each solution in exact form. (b) Solve the inequality , giving the boundary correct to 3 significant figures.
Answers
-
(3 s.f.).
-
(3 s.f.).
-
(3 s.f.).
-
and , so , i.e. (3 s.f.).
-
. Since , the inequality reverses: (3 s.f.).
-
, so . (Check: and .)
-
and . With : . is impossible since , so and .
-
With : . So , giving .
-
(a) Let , so and the equation is . If : , so or , both . These give and . If : . Only satisfies , giving (). Three solutions: , () and . (b) With : or . Since , only is possible, so (3 s.f.).